Moderator: Soñadora
BeauV wrote:I don't use windy because as far as I can tell it doesn't display the difference between steady breeze and gusts, which matters a lot around here. Am I missing a way to make it do that?
I do like the big ocean picture as a way of spotting the Low where the NOAA image just has a big "L".
Also, I can never tell which color is which wind speed exactly.
The website you are trying to access is not available at this time due to a lapse in appropriation.
NOAA.gov and specific NOAA websites necessary to protect lives and property are operational and will be maintained during this partial closure of the U.S. Government.
See weather.gov for forecasts and critical weather information.
BeauV wrote:Ok, you guys got me to go re-try Windy. It has changed a lot since I last looked. Nice product. I bought the "Pro" version, as it's great to support folks doing this. I took a look at FastSeas.com too, I'll have to read more but looks encouraging.
Thanks!
Orestes Munn wrote:BeauV wrote:Ok, you guys got me to go re-try Windy. It has changed a lot since I last looked. Nice product. I bought the "Pro" version, as it's great to support folks doing this. I took a look at FastSeas.com too, I'll have to read more but looks encouraging.
Thanks!
What Pro version and what can it do that the other one doesn't?
BeauV wrote:Orestes Munn wrote:BeauV wrote:Ok, you guys got me to go re-try Windy. It has changed a lot since I last looked. Nice product. I bought the "Pro" version, as it's great to support folks doing this. I took a look at FastSeas.com too, I'll have to read more but looks encouraging.
Thanks!
What Pro version and what can it do that the other one doesn't?
Eric,
I hadn't realized until your question that there are two Windy applications [url]Windy.com[/url] and [url]Windy.app[/url]. These two seem to be having a battle-of-the-brands with Windy.com who is known on the iThings as: "Windy.com"; while the Windy.app version is known on the iThings as: "WINDY"
I haven't used "Windy.com", which claims to be the original, but the "WINDY" app has a "Pro" version that says things like "No adds" etc....
You can read about the battle from "Windy.com" point of view HERE. Both appear in the Apple App Store. "Windy.com" is "free" but I haven't dug into it enough to figure out why I should care.
BTW - I am trusting Apple to have vetted both parties as decent companies. I did put my credit card into the supposed "Russian" company's request for in-app purchases. We'll see. That credit card has a pretty low limit and every fraud alert known to man assigned to it. I'll post if anything bad happens.
kdh wrote:I find the PredictWind app and website good. A plain animated view of the GFS and European models.
By the way, the European model seems far superior these days. Apparently the government shutdown is delaying release of a GFS update, but that likely has little to do with it.
BeauV wrote:In checking out the FastSeas app, I started looking around at where it gets its data. I didn't know I'd run into this. I'm sure glad I wasn't counting on any weather predictions for a mid-winter passage!The website you are trying to access is not available at this time due to a lapse in appropriation.
NOAA.gov and specific NOAA websites necessary to protect lives and property are operational and will be maintained during this partial closure of the U.S. Government.
See weather.gov for forecasts and critical weather information.
Orestes Munn wrote:kdh wrote:I find the PredictWind app and website good. A plain animated view of the GFS and European models.
By the way, the European model seems far superior these days. Apparently the government shutdown is delaying release of a GFS update, but that likely has little to do with it.
I've only seen the free version of PredictWind, which I thought was okay but a little scanty, e.g., no observations and only surface maps. I thought the ECMWF had always been better and higher res than the GFS.
Olaf Hart wrote:I would assume that the longer the time interval, the more difficulty it is to predict weather and optimal routing, or have I missed something?
I generally only trust weather forecasts for three days round here.
BeauV wrote:Olaf Hart wrote:I would assume that the longer the time interval, the more difficulty it is to predict weather and optimal routing, or have I missed something?
I generally only trust weather forecasts for three days round here.
Oh, I agree. I don't expect a genuinely accurate forecast beyond 3 days. For a 20 day passage (like SF to Tahiti) one would have to work from historical averages. That was part of my reason for running the test. I wanted to try and figure out what the software did with weather well outside of a local forecast. Interestingly, FastSeas appears to just revert to the rhumb line and head straight at the goal. It does display a dotted line, meaning (I think) that it's guessing. Nothing wrong with that, I just need to know it.
BTW, forecasting trade wind direction and speed is highly accurate in the winter when there are far fewer squalls and usually no hurricanes. Summer time is a LOT harder.