Moderator: Soñadora
Tim Ford wrote:Not thread drift at all, Beau.
The older kid up in NH has an ancient AWD Impreza Sport, I think it is pre-2000. The damn thing refuses to die, with something like 185+ K on it. Her S.O., friends and family keep telling her to get rid of it, but it keeps starting in -10 degree temps and delivering her back and forth on the 20 mile commute she faces, daily.
So, yeah, not a bad ride!
Thanks for the heads-up on the Toyota lemon, Larry...I wonder if it's just specific to that model/year? My neighbor bought two Toyotas on the same day for his wife and daughter and swears by them, not at them (I mean swears by the cars, not his wife and daughter)
Irie, I like Edmunds, too! I think they used to provide very specific pricing info, including what the dealer pays for new cars, but I haven't spent time looking for that info yet. Hopefully it's still there. They also used to have a primer with 6 or 7 bullet points of advice for buyers...not sure that's still on their website. But thanks for the reminder!
Chris Chesley wrote:To some degree, I suspect that any manufacturer produces some percentage of cars that are problem children. Sounds like you were the unfortunate recipient of one. I can say that my Toyota Highlander Hybrid has run flawlessly for 5 years. 28 mpg (or better) on the highway AND around town always, only done oil changes, new tires at 50k miles, no alignments, still on the first set of brake pads and rotors and still looks and feels like a new car. YMMV.
TheOffice wrote:I'm on my 4th BMW. 2 or 3 have had run-flats. No problems with abnormal wear. Just picked up an end of model Infiniti QX50. When the wife's Tesla 3 comes in I'll take that and sell the 128 convertible.
Traded the last BMW with 160,000 miles on it when the door locks failed and I had to climb out the passenger door. While the drive train is suppesed to be engineered for 350,000 miles, little shit starts breaking around 150,000.
BeauV wrote:Larry,
That said, sailing is bad enough for eating money. Race cars are right up there with airplanes if you do it right.
BeauV wrote:Larry, Race cars are right up there with airplanes if you do it right.
Charlie wrote:I'd think painting an airplane is easier/cheaper than painting a boat. No antifouling needed. Do you need fancy 2-part LP?
Unless there's some special lighter-than-air paint required.
BeauV wrote:Steve,
Why does anyone paint an alloy plane??? I remember the CEO of American Airlines once saying how many millions they saved by NOT painting their airplanes. He listed weight of the paint, time the plane was out of service, and all the stuff you've listed above. So......
Why does anyone paint an alloy plane??
B
BeauV wrote:Steve,
Why does anyone paint an alloy plane??? I remember the CEO of American Airlines once saying how many millions they saved by NOT painting their airplanes. He listed weight of the paint, time the plane was out of service, and all the stuff you've listed above. So......
Why does anyone paint an alloy plane??
B
Tim Ford wrote:Thanks, good advice, Tigger.
With regard to the older Honda's, back in the early 70's, my father was driving a big old Pontiac Grand Prix, the one with the long hood/short deck which introduced a proper driver's "cockpit" as a marketing gimmick. Cool car with a 400 CID 8 and a 4 barrel carb. Handled pretty well perhaps a bit of understeer.
While I was out of town, he traded in the beast for a tiny Honda...I think this was pre-civic. Had a two-speed torque converter, little transverse mounted 4 cyl. FWD. I got home and saw the car in the driveway and gave my father the 70's equivalent of WTF???? He said, "take it for a drive!"
I did, it was a blast.
After about 8 years, he passed the car on to me. It was a wreck, rusted out, my father took terrible care of cars. But: it still ran like a demon.
Two years later, I got back from the Middle East and went to get the car. I was out of the country for 14 months and the car was under a tarp in my grandfather's back yard. Pulled the tarp off under a ton of leaves, climbed into the drivers seat and said, what the heck, I'll see if the battery has any juice in it.
Turned the key and the engine fired up instantly! I mean, it was as if the thing had been driven an hour ago, not 14 months.
I drove it for another 2 years, including whilst courting my wife...the doors were held shut with bungie cordsGOOD TIMES!
BeauV wrote:
Those early Hondas were a HOOT!! I loved driving my x-girlfriends way back in the day.
Jamie wrote:Tim Ford wrote:Thanks, good advice, Tigger.
With regard to the older Honda's, back in the early 70's, my father was driving a big old Pontiac Grand Prix, the one with the long hood/short deck which introduced a proper driver's "cockpit" as a marketing gimmick. Cool car with a 400 CID 8 and a 4 barrel carb. Handled pretty well perhaps a bit of understeer.
While I was out of town, he traded in the beast for a tiny Honda...I think this was pre-civic. Had a two-speed torque converter, little transverse mounted 4 cyl. FWD. I got home and saw the car in the driveway and gave my father the 70's equivalent of WTF???? He said, "take it for a drive!"
I did, it was a blast.
After about 8 years, he passed the car on to me. It was a wreck, rusted out, my father took terrible care of cars. But: it still ran like a demon.
Two years later, I got back from the Middle East and went to get the car. I was out of the country for 14 months and the car was under a tarp in my grandfather's back yard. Pulled the tarp off under a ton of leaves, climbed into the drivers seat and said, what the heck, I'll see if the battery has any juice in it.
Turned the key and the engine fired up instantly! I mean, it was as if the thing had been driven an hour ago, not 14 months.
I drove it for another 2 years, including whilst courting my wife...the doors were held shut with bungie cordsGOOD TIMES!
When you car topped a Blue Jay or 420 on those little CVVCs, it made for some interesting highway travel.