Scantlings

Posted: **Wed Mar 16, 2016 6:56 am**

OM,

Think this will work?

Posted: **Wed Mar 16, 2016 7:00 am**

LarryHoward wrote:OM,

Think this will work?

Do you have any idea what a hassle it is trying to claim one of those money-back things? ...especially from the 30s, or whatever?

Posted: **Wed Mar 16, 2016 8:08 am**

Think of how rich you'll be when you invent the time machine...

Posted: **Wed Mar 16, 2016 10:39 am**

There are people that can predict what sex your baby will be when it is born, from a picture of you or pretty much anything you want to give them. They offer a money back guarantee if they are wrong and cheerfully pay up . . . . . . . . about half the time.

Brilliant business model.

Posted: **Wed Mar 16, 2016 11:44 am**

Damn, I thought the cone heads of SNL were "original" - clearly the were not

I also love the "Free product, shipping and handling of $12,99" The product costs about $1 to make, real shipping and handling is about $4, and the gross margin is better than Apple Comptuer.

Posted: **Wed Mar 16, 2016 11:58 am**

BeauV wrote:Damn, I thought the cone heads of SNL were "original" - clearly the were not

I also love the "Free product, shipping and handling of $12,99" The product costs about $1 to make, real shipping and handling is about $4, and the gross margin is better than Apple Comptuer.

"as seen on TV" and "But wait. There's more!" comes to mind.

Then there is this. What would Bloomberg say?

Posted: **Wed Mar 16, 2016 1:07 pm**

LarryHoward wrote:
BeauV wrote:Damn, I thought the cone heads of SNL were "original" - clearly the were not

I also love the "Free product, shipping and handling of $12,99" The product costs about $1 to make, real shipping and handling is about $4, and the gross margin is better than Apple Comptuer.

"as seen on TV" and "But wait. There's more!" comes to mind.

Then there is this. What would Bloomberg say?

And that might have been when Coca Cola had cocaine as one of its "active ingredients."

Posted: **Wed Mar 16, 2016 3:51 pm**

kdh wrote:
LarryHoward wrote:
BeauV wrote:Damn, I thought the cone heads of SNL were "original" - clearly the were not

I also love the "Free product, shipping and handling of $12,99" The product costs about $1 to make, real shipping and handling is about $4, and the gross margin is better than Apple Comptuer.

"as seen on TV" and "But wait. There's more!" comes to mind.

Then there is this. What would Bloomberg say?

And that might have been when Coca Cola had cocaine as one of its "active ingredients."

"active" is probably exactly the right word for it!

Posted: **Wed Mar 16, 2016 5:37 pm**

The cola ad seems a little bogus. Is it legit?

Posted: **Wed Mar 16, 2016 6:34 pm**

Bull City wrote:The cola ad seems a little bogus. Is it legit?

http://hoaxes.org/weblog/comments/start_cola_earlier_says_the_soda_pop_board_of_america

Posted: **Thu Mar 17, 2016 7:49 am**

I'm not going to let that stop me- burn the witches I say, burn them in hell.

Posted: **Wed Jul 27, 2016 8:42 pm**

What about these? Would wear them? My dad had a pair.

spectators.jpg

Posted: **Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:09 pm**

Bull City wrote:What about these? Would wear them? My dad had a pair.
spectators.jpg

Your dad would have had to have a pair to wear those.

Posted: **Thu Jul 28, 2016 5:50 am**

Way to swat that softball right out of the park, Ish! :lol:

Posted: **Thu Jul 28, 2016 11:32 am**

A pair of breasts, no less.

Posted: **Thu Jul 28, 2016 11:40 am**

kdh wrote:A pair of breasts, no less.

Yeah, one is too few and three is too many.

Posted: **Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:01 pm**

My golf shoes look like those, actually...except in black.

Posted: **Thu Jul 28, 2016 4:31 pm**

Tim Ford wrote:My golf shoes look like those, actually...except in black.

Black and white, or all black?

Posted: **Thu Jul 28, 2016 4:34 pm**

Ish wrote:
Bull City wrote:What about these? Would wear them? My dad had a pair.
spectators.jpg

Your dad would have had to have a pair to wear those.

He also had a pair that were brown suede and alligator. No, he wasn't a pimp, rather he was born in 1905. My little sister was born when he was 51, so I guess he had a pair.

Scantlings

Nice Hat

Nice Hat

Re: Nice Hat

Re: Nice Hat

Re: Nice Hat

Re: Nice Hat

Re: Nice Hat

Re: Nice Hat

Re: Nice Hat

Re: Nice Hat

Re: Nice Hat

Re: Nice Hat

Re: Nice Hat

Re: Nice Hat

Re: Nice Hat

Re: Nice Hat

Re: Nice Hat

Re: Nice Hat

Re: Nice Hat

Re: Nice Hat