Moderator: Soñadora
Orestes Munn wrote:Hey,
Has anyone here actually gotten a printer to on a home network to reconnect in a functional way after going to sleep? About 3 Times out of 5, ours pretends not to hear devices, but shows up on the router and responds to pings. Only turning it and the router off and on gets it back online. Have assigned it its very own IP address and futzed with every other setting I can think of, short of keeping it awake. We are updating the router today, but I am not optimistic.
BeauV wrote:Orestes Munn wrote:Hey,
Has anyone here actually gotten a printer to on a home network to reconnect in a functional way after going to sleep? About 3 Times out of 5, ours pretends not to hear devices, but shows up on the router and responds to pings. Only turning it and the router off and on gets it back online. Have assigned it its very own IP address and futzed with every other setting I can think of, short of keeping it awake. We are updating the router today, but I am not optimistic.
IP network printer or Bonjour? If you're not using, you might consider it. This has solved a host of problems for us. Apple even supports Bonjour on Windows. At my old company, it ran all the printers regardless of what OS they were running.
Ajax wrote:My new laptop doesn't even have an ethernet port. Irritating.
TheOffice wrote:While we are off-topic - I am adding a small wifi module to my AIS receiver. Can I coat the board in silicone (or something else) to weatherproof it?
Ajax wrote:I'm satisfied with my choice so far. The facial recognition login is very quick. Occasionally it takes a couple of seconds longer if I'm not wearing my glasses. I wonder if I should have created my facial login without my glasses on. Battery life is satisfactory, response time, wake-up time and generally "doing things" are all fast enough for my liking.
SemiSalt wrote:Ajax wrote:I'm satisfied with my choice so far. The facial recognition login is very quick. Occasionally it takes a couple of seconds longer if I'm not wearing my glasses. I wonder if I should have created my facial login without my glasses on. Battery life is satisfactory, response time, wake-up time and generally "doing things" are all fast enough for my liking.
On the subject of bio-driven login, I have a Samsung tablet that's about 3 months old. It has a fingerprint reader, which works fine. However, it doesn't work when my hands have been wet, such as just after taking shower or doing some dishes.
SemiSalt wrote:Ajax wrote:I'm satisfied with my choice so far. The facial recognition login is very quick. Occasionally it takes a couple of seconds longer if I'm not wearing my glasses. I wonder if I should have created my facial login without my glasses on. Battery life is satisfactory, response time, wake-up time and generally "doing things" are all fast enough for my liking.
On the subject of bio-driven login, I have a Samsung tablet that's about 3 months old. It has a fingerprint reader, which works fine. However, it doesn't work when my hands have been wet, such as just after taking shower or doing some dishes.
BeauV wrote:I think that the fingerprint readers are working on capacitance, which would be changed quite radically by water.
BeauV wrote:One of the better features of the Apple Watch is that it will log you into your Apple computer as you walk up to it. The watch either piggybacks on the facial/finger recognition from the iPhone it is linked to, or you can type in a number password. You only need to log into the watch once in the morning when you put it on. I probably use that feature of the watch at least a dozen times a day as I'm forever working on the computer for 5 min. then walking away (Auto log out is set for 30 seconds) and coming back 10 minutes later.
kdh wrote:BeauV wrote:One of the better features of the Apple Watch is that it will log you into your Apple computer as you walk up to it. The watch either piggybacks on the facial/finger recognition from the iPhone it is linked to, or you can type in a number password. You only need to log into the watch once in the morning when you put it on. I probably use that feature of the watch at least a dozen times a day as I'm forever working on the computer for 5 min. then walking away (Auto log out is set for 30 seconds) and coming back 10 minutes later.
I've never put a password on a phone or tablet or computer. Very fast to get logged in that way.
Jamie wrote:1Password
Not 100% ideal, but much better than most systems
Ajax wrote:Ish: <facepalm>.
I think I've told this story, but I'll tell it again just in case:
Wife: Something is wrong with my computer, can you take a look at it?
Me: (Sitting down at her laptop, I am presented with the Windows password dialogue which has an icon you click on, to select the account you want to log in with.) "Sure, what's your password, or come over here and type it in."
Wife: "Just click on the kitty."
You folks running around with no passwords or easy passwords are just killing me. Do you do electronic banking on your laptops? Do you save the passwords in your browser cache? Credit card numbers? If you do, please lock down your machines.
Jamie wrote:1Password
Not 100% ideal, but much better than most systems
Ajax wrote:Ish: <facepalm>.
I think I've told this story, but I'll tell it again just in case:
Wife: Something is wrong with my computer, can you take a look at it?
Me: (Sitting down at her laptop, I am presented with the Windows password dialogue which has an icon you click on, to select the account you want to log in with.) "Sure, what's your password, or come over here and type it in."
Wife: "Just click on the kitty."
You folks running around with no passwords or easy passwords are just killing me. Do you do electronic banking on your laptops? Do you save the passwords in your browser cache? Credit card numbers? If you do, please lock down your machines.