Moderator: Soñadora
TheOffice wrote:But the cab has a heater!
Ajax wrote:https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/02/health/aerosol-coronavirus-spread-white-house-letter/index.html
JFC, are you kidding me? Now they're saying it can be spread by talking or just breathing?
I would NOT have consented to working in my shared office if I'd known this.
Ajax wrote:Damn news hype. They're making it confusing and scary for us non medical people.
LarryHoward wrote:One thing to keep in mind. This virus is moving to “Community Spread” in pretty much any area where there are more than a few isolated cases, even in “little St Mary’s County” with 110K residents and 23 cases, we declared that it is now community spread yesterday afternoon. Probably doesn’t help that probably 2/3 of the working adults are in essential businesses. Even with max telework and a stay home order, there are a lot of people out and about. You don’t need to have direct contact to catch it. People (and businesses) need to pay lots of attention to cleaning and other precautions.
BeauV wrote:OH, can you direct me to any credible concrete information on survival rates for intubated patients with COVID-19? I'm having trouble turning up sources I trust. I'm also dubious about analogies with SARS1.
Olaf Hart wrote:BeauV wrote:OH, can you direct me to any credible concrete information on survival rates for intubated patients with COVID-19? I'm having trouble turning up sources I trust. I'm also dubious about analogies with SARS1.
Early figures from China, better survival rate in intubated patients, but survival only around 20%
Olaf Hart wrote:Those were the early Seattle figures as well, but another third could not come off a ventilator.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-sho ... 9-patients
Olaf Hart wrote:Ajax, the inflammatory changes are so severe in people needing ventilation that they will inevitable have scar tissue throughout their lungs at an alveolar level, so gas exchange will be permanently affected.
Tim Ford wrote:Olaf Hart wrote:Ajax, the inflammatory changes are so severe in people needing ventilation that they will inevitable have scar tissue throughout their lungs at an alveolar level, so gas exchange will be permanently affected.
Did not know that. So then a "full recovery" from a severe case is unlikely?
Dang, I guess I better start being more careful...as a mildly asthmatic, too.
Ajax wrote:I spoke to my Deputy PM and he swears that they just found out about this positive case yesterday. Apparently the infected employee couldn't get tested right away and there was a considerable delay in getting results. None of that is any surprise.
I've commandeered our network lab as my personal work space. No more office mates. I've sanitized everything in here. It's hot, cramped and windowless, but at least I'm alone.
Benno von Humpback wrote:
I have gone in a few times to fix computer issues for my people
Ajax wrote:Benno von Humpback wrote:
I have gone in a few times to fix computer issues for my people
I'm sorry, but I laughed inwardly at this. I never had you pegged as IT support. Bravo!
Olaf Hart wrote:In an ideal situation, ventilation would achieve much better results if we had an effective antiviral medication.
The emphasis on ICU and ventilators is a red herring, the only effective management here is old school public health measures until then.
Benno von Humpback wrote:Ajax wrote:Benno von Humpback wrote:
I have gone in a few times to fix computer issues for my people
I'm sorry, but I laughed inwardly at this. I never had you pegged as IT support. Bravo!
Less paperwork that way and I know they're not farting around and putting themselves or others at risk (not that this crew would). I spend most of my time being clinical support, copy editor, etc. Might as well add low-level IT to my PD.
BeauV wrote:Olaf Hart wrote:In an ideal situation, ventilation would achieve much better results if we had an effective antiviral medication.[url][/url]
The emphasis on ICU and ventilators is a red herring, the only effective management here is old school public health measures until then.
OH, thanks yet again for the straight facts on this. Like the rest, I hadn't thought much about the lung damage. In digging into this, the only analog we have for it is the World War 1 veterans who came home from the front with massive lung damage from gas attacks. This is really bad news for us all long term.
On a more positive note, reading has turned up a theory I'd like your thoughts on: If the "viral load" a person is subjected to is small enough, do they develop immunities without becoming seriously infected? I may be suffering from the fallacy of the converse here: knowing that a large viral load suffered by healthcare workers is bad, can a very small viral load allow someone to develop immunity slowly and safely??
BeauV wrote:Benno von Humpback wrote:Ajax wrote:Benno von Humpback wrote:
I have gone in a few times to fix computer issues for my people
I'm sorry, but I laughed inwardly at this. I never had you pegged as IT support. Bravo!
Less paperwork that way and I know they're not farting around and putting themselves or others at risk (not that this crew would). I spend most of my time being clinical support, copy editor, etc. Might as well add low-level IT to my PD.
It's happening to a lot of us. I'm writing tip-sheets for how to use video-conferencing, use of drop-box, searching for lost emails....