Moderator: Soñadora
Found this quote discussing an engine up grade from 40 HP to a whopping 86 HP. “if you stay on the throttle……the back end will stay behind you…..or at worst, next to you!”BeauV wrote:JoeP wrote:More fun to drive a slow car fast than a fast car slow the saying goes. One of my sisters had a first generation Fiesta which was a hoot to drive as fast as you could. Just wind up that little 1300cc(?) rubber band and have at it.
Yup! An Italian friend used to race the little Abarth 850cc toy cars. He let me drive it a number of times, it was a complete hoot. If I remember correctly, you didn't shift until the valves floated. Good times. BV
cap10ed wrote:Found this quote discussing an engine up grade from 40 HP to a whopping 86 HP. “if you stay on the throttle……the back end will stay behind you…..or at worst, next to you!”BeauV wrote:JoeP wrote:More fun to drive a slow car fast than a fast car slow the saying goes. One of my sisters had a first generation Fiesta which was a hoot to drive as fast as you could. Just wind up that little 1300cc(?) rubber band and have at it.
Yup! An Italian friend used to race the little Abarth 850cc toy cars. He let me drive it a number of times, it was a complete hoot. If I remember correctly, you didn't shift until the valves floated. Good times. BV![]()
BeauV wrote:SloopJonB wrote:BeauV wrote:You've just articulated why I spend all my hot-rod dollars and time on a '65 Morgan. Engine: bored and stroked, oversize webbers, dry sump, etc.... Suspension: (I know the suspension on a Morgan is actually a joke) new valve in the rear shocks, damper flaps on the front end etc... Body: toss the windshield, side curtains, heater, windshield wipers (don't need 'em if you don't have a windshield), etc....
At the end of the day, the Morgan is still slower than the chipped JCW Mini but it FEELS a hell of a lot faster with my old ass only 5" from the ground and the long hood. Of course no muffler and those big webbers slurping up air make it feel faster too.
Trying to hot rod a modern car is sort of like trying to "improve" the design of an AC-72, not for amateurs.
A dry sumped Morgan.There must be a term for that - eccentric just seems inadequate. Idiosyncratic maybe? I'm surprised one can generate enough sustained lateral G's to need it. (or is it simply because it takes so long to get all the way through the corners?
) Your car sounds like a true hot rod, even if it did come from Malvern Link and not Detroit.
By the way, have you ever seen a +4+? We used to have a Morgan dealer in Vancouver and they had one of the ultra rare beasts in their window - for several years. You sure would have had to have been skinny and limber to get in one - it had the shortest doors of any car I've ever seen - made a TVR's look long.
The +4+ was one of the first of various "weird" Morgans that the family tried, attempting to be more modern. But, like the 911, the customers revolted and demanded the older looking car. I've actually driven a +4+ that was set up for top speed runs! because I only weighed 135 lbs in those days. It was terrifying going 128 mph in that thing!!![]()
The dry sump is because the oil pressure hit zero on about 1/2 the turns at Laguna Seca when running on race tires. It also let me lower the engine 4", although I've never been convinced that mattered. It didn't change my lap times. There is also a rear axel oil cooler and scavenging system that sucks diff oil for the outboard ends of the axel tubes and dumps it into the top of the diff after running it through a cooler. This was installed after I burned out the third set of port side rear axel bearings on the old Laguna Seca course where the oil spend the entire time from turn 1 up the hill to the corkscrew pushed to starboard.
Puttering around Laguna Seca in the Morgan is about three times as much fun as the 996 Turbo cab. Although the AC was comfy in the Porch.
LarryHoward wrote:cap10ed wrote:Found this quote discussing an engine up grade from 40 HP to a whopping 86 HP. “if you stay on the throttle……the back end will stay behind you…..or at worst, next to you!”BeauV wrote:JoeP wrote:More fun to drive a slow car fast than a fast car slow the saying goes. One of my sisters had a first generation Fiesta which was a hoot to drive as fast as you could. Just wind up that little 1300cc(?) rubber band and have at it.
Yup! An Italian friend used to race the little Abarth 850cc toy cars. He let me drive it a number of times, it was a complete hoot. If I remember correctly, you didn't shift until the valves floated. Good times. BV![]()
B(L)MC engines didn't need rev limiters. Valve float was the English solution since a Lucas limiter would never have worked anyway.
LarryHoward wrote:Cherie320 wrote:Go back to the Honda SI - snip --- snip --.
-- Snip -- Simple house rules. No mods allowed that move the car out of SCCA Solo stock classification. -- snip --
For graduation, we -- snip -- figure they can keep the good used cars we already provided for a few more years.
SloopJonB wrote:LarryHoward wrote:cap10ed wrote:Found this quote discussing an engine up grade from 40 HP to a whopping 86 HP. “if you stay on the throttle……the back end will stay behind you…..or at worst, next to you!”BeauV wrote:JoeP wrote:More fun to drive a slow car fast than a fast car slow the saying goes. One of my sisters had a first generation Fiesta which was a hoot to drive as fast as you could. Just wind up that little 1300cc(?) rubber band and have at it.
Yup! An Italian friend used to race the little Abarth 850cc toy cars. He let me drive it a number of times, it was a complete hoot. If I remember correctly, you didn't shift until the valves floated. Good times. BV![]()
B(L)MC engines didn't need rev limiters. Valve float was the English solution since a Lucas limiter would never have worked anyway.
Here are a couple of my favourite "Lucas" bits for you all.
BeauV wrote:Everyone who has one of those "LUCAS - PRINCE OF DARKNESS" lapel pins raise you hand!
JoeP wrote:My wife had a '76 Triumph Spitball when we met. I was constantly chasing gremlins. Lights, alternator, electric overdrive cutting in & out. The instruments worked, sometimes.
SloopJonB wrote:JoeP wrote:My wife had a '76 Triumph Spitball when we met. I was constantly chasing gremlins. Lights, alternator, electric overdrive cutting in & out. The instruments worked, sometimes.
My wife's cousin and her husband are the most courageous and adventurous people I have ever known (or even heard of) - they had a Triumph GT6 and took a cross country trip from Cali to the east coast in it.![]()
Talk about guts.
Cherie320 wrote:Our GT6 had an alternator. That made a world of difference in the electrical reliability of the car.
My aunt and uncle drove an XK120 from California to Kansas in the 50s. That car spent a month in our Wichita driveway waiting for a generator. I think that may have been a Lucas problem.
Slick470 wrote:Cherie320 wrote:--- snip ---:
Slight Hijack... Wichita eh? I grew up there. Parents still live in Bel Aire. Sailed on Cheney at Ninnescah Sailing Assn. Good times.
JoeP wrote:My wife had a '76 Triumph Spitball when we met. I was constantly chasing gremlins. Lights, alternator, electric overdrive cutting in & out. The instruments worked, sometimes.
JoeP wrote:Not a Lucas issue but one day I finished tuning my Datsun 1600 roadster and drove to a friend's house to visit. A few minutes after I arrived his little brother came in and said "Hey Joe your car is smoking". I went outside and sure enough it was, from the engine compartment. I opened the hood and looked in and saw that the copper drain tube from the carbs had rotated enough that it shorted against the battery cable to the starter and was glowing red. Yikes! I quickly grabbed a piece of wood and knocked it away. I am sure if it had gone on any longer my car would have burst into flames.